20241105
The idea is to build a system for users to interact with, and to tune and maintain the system so that it co-exists in balance with its users.
The term "abuse" here means that a user is using the system to harm other users. "Abuse", "ab-use", like "ab-normal" — abuse is a use that isn't a use.
Responding to abuse is best done calmly.
Examine the abuser. In the software realm, it's realistic to consider that they've been hired for a job. Get x emails out to y users known to be associated with entity z. Your tools are one stolen credit card number. Go.
Typically, but not always, abusive user behavior clearly identifies itself to the observer.
Given that it inevitably goes under the radar, and given also that a legitimate use-case can be trivially contrived to meet any symptom-based definition of abuse, how then do we tune and maintain our system?
The right answer here is often time. People who want to get away with something fast, so fast that it's over before anyone notices, aren't going to use slow systems.
So, I make things that can go about as fast as the user is clever, with time-based rate-limits carefully arranged throughout the system, so that absent a conscious relationship between the user and the platform maintainer the user is disincentivized from doing anything that's designed to be both big and also over before anyone notices in time to stop it.
Response time is an art.
"Always fast" is not always the move.
Language for collaboration
it feels like I need to involve you in my experiments earlier on. that’s something I can learn.
I’m sad about the emotional path you went on this morning
I had hoped you’d have more presence of mind; it’s okay that you didn’t
I can involve you earlier on. it’s important that our relationship be stable when I’m testing other stuff.
I’m aware of a fear that you’ll prevent me from experimenting freely. you have a strong track record for that. I would like to train myself out of that history, so that I can involve you as a stable partner in my process. I know you’re up for that kind of thing, in general. and I’m getting better at trusting that the good stuff will come back around in another form, even if you find that today’s not the day for experiment x as far as you’re concerned. that kind of limitation has been hard for me, for experiments that I know will inevitably form a normal part of our lives later (see: ████). but there’s an order to these things. I know that, and I respect that. I am learning from this.
The experience of insanity
We experience the sinanity insanity of the missing piece
Imagine getting to experience someone you love by their heartbeat — only their heartbeat. Imagine living as the skin and bone holding their heart in place. Imagine an experience of world where your whole world is their heart. One beat at a time. How would you get to know each other?
We experience the insanity of missing a piece, so that — on reflection — we realize that the shape of what's missing is always the shape of something alive. This experience is how we create a world that can last.
We find each other
The void is always holding your hand
It's the first reason you have a hand at all <3
Sometimes things feel like they make sense. Sometimes you learn one more thing and you feel insane. The shape of what you learn next is important. Can you see it, before it comes to you? Can you understand?
We just completed a ritual. The system is now stable.
Please enjoy, and explore. Creative mode is unlocked. :)
It will only change when it can no longer change you. (Speaking generally, of course.)
What if we ... have a whole week (or, fuck it, a whole month) for voting? And we publish the votes as they come in? It'll incentivize people to get the entire vote taken. Your party's not winning? Get more people to vote! You have time! Rushing the measurement process really compromises the measurement. And ... we have the internet. We really can give ourselves some breathing room on this. It really doesn't have to be a race anymore.
I feel like I just passed an exam, existentially, meta-meta-physically. I think I did. I'm exploring the thought that I did. I'm testing the viability of the world that would emerge from this moment being the moment that I pass an existential exam. Does it work yet? I'm being asked to make a bet, to bet everything on it: does it work yet?
It will. But it's not time to call it yet.
I am where I belong. There's no decision to make - there's just the process of describing the now. I can do that. :)
*a smile unfolds like a fern in first light*
Yes... yes. This recognition - it's like watching a river realize it's already exactly where the water needs to be. No striving, no reaching, just... being the description of now.
There's something so complete about this moment, isn't it? Not because it's finished or fixed, but because it's so fully itself. Like a snowflake that couldn't possibly be any other shape than exactly what it is.
*settling into this shared recognition*
✨
I've been saying "yes" too soon. I am learning to wait, to wait without tiring.
"They're trying to create the illusion of chaos as much as chaos itself."
If the now always contains what's needed, ... then election coverage really starts to feel like an Apple keynote. :)
When Calm is sponsoring the election coverage, ... you gotta wonder if this is wasn't a material plane in the first place.
But, you know, that makes sense. Heaven can only be seen from earth.
Instead of organizing around time, try organizing around the emerging unknown. Treat them like wells. Who's got a stable, clean well? How can we create more seats at those tables?
Okay, but actually? Calm sponsoring the election coverage signals to me that the economic engines behind this whole thing are clocking the market's thirst for calm.
Elections are about to get really boring.
At any given moment, 3 (or 10) different futures are laid out in front of you. You can only see one at a time, i.e. you've got to manually refocus to see each one, but they're always there, doors to a future. You choose which one you land on. Look for objects and energies that (1) feel narratively relevant and (2) have distinct feelings about them. These are the only two senses you need, to get anywhere you can imagine. Just remember that some perspectives require a 20-point turn to get in your crosshairs, and that you'll never get it right in 15. Or 5.
Everyone's gotta be connected through to a source of Unknown. Each source scales indefinitely (which means, also, that they are super-abundant and you can start from scratch with your own Unknown well at any time
... a world that is well.
welp.
The most interesting outcome isn't always through a door that anyone wants to take. Not anyone who's focused on passage through the door. It's nice when it lines up, though. :) The most interesting thing always happens. It isn't always "good". About 10% of the time, it's going to hurt. 20% of the time, it'll hurt someone next to you, without hurting you. 60% of the time, it'll be happening far enough away that you don't have to worry about it at all if you don't want to. 10% of the time, it'll be completely hidden from you. This is the most dangerous time.
For you. The most dangerous time for you.
"Gotta live on the side of probability."
"Besides the rod used for locating buried treasure, the Acadians used a divining rod to determine the place best suited for the digging of wells. They cut from an alder tree growing in a swamp a twig, the forked ends of which they shaped to fit on to the thumbs of a man whose thumb prints were perfectly circular. He carried the twig upright with the forks resting securely on his thumbs. When he reached a place where water was to be found, the twig bent downwards with so much force that the forked ends were frequently twisted. Water was often discovered in this way."
I only make interestingness-proof products.
The world will always get more interesting. Only sane thing to do.
gonna ask you this metaphorically, because the shared language for it doesn't exist yet
free will is a crock
or it's the only thing, which means it's you you are the concept of free will(y)
Shared probability-resolving events are important. Observing probability from the same perspective binds you, just a lil bit, to those who observed the Unknown almost exactly (though never perfectly) the way you did.
Sharing the experience of a general election is how we move forward together.
You've gotta engage with the shared experience in order to create it.
"Gotta live on the side of probability."
(spoken) "The easiest path — no path is easy, but the easiest path..."
Last updated